Sorry you're feeling cranky, and I hope my bit of navel-gazing isn't contributing to it at all. As I said, it's all about what I might be lacking, nothing more.
It was just kind of an icky day yesterday - a lot of little things went wrong and the combined result made me quite irritated.
As for the navel-gazing, don't worry, it's not a problem. In fact, I was thinking about the topic some more - there have been multiple times where someone has said something to me that makes me wonder what they're seeing in me. (I can give you specific examples if you'd like, but if so, let's do it in person.)
After thinking about it, I decided it's because each of the people who had given me pause with their comments had only seen one slice of me. I didn't spend significant time with any of them, or the time I did spend was in situations when I was likely to behave the same way each time.
Just saying that, however, I realized there was one person who DID know much more of me than that. But there were extenuating circumstances that make me doubt that person's motivation for saying what they said. (Sorry to be so cryptic. Again with the offer to explain in person.)
Wow, I just read over this post. Apparently I shouldn't try to respond before having any caffeine in the morning.
[Harper]"Oh, I hope she's mad! She's hot when she's mad!" [/Harper]
But if getting sexed-up by the Niblet isn't enough, I'm prepped n ready to come over and immediately beat all your minor inconveniences to a greasy pulp.
I thought about you the other day - WLUW was doing a fundraising drive and to entice people they were having a drawing for a lifetime pass to Schuba's. Free shows whenever you want!
no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 05:05 am (UTC)btw...sorry I missed you late Friday night. I tried to find you but when an old lady like me crashes? We crash! I had a blast and I hope you did too.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-09 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 06:24 am (UTC)Sorry you're feeling cranky, and I hope my bit of navel-gazing isn't contributing to it at all. As I said, it's all about what I might be lacking, nothing more.
Hope you feel better soon.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-09 12:53 pm (UTC)As for the navel-gazing, don't worry, it's not a problem. In fact, I was thinking about the topic some more - there have been multiple times where someone has said something to me that makes me wonder what they're seeing in me. (I can give you specific examples if you'd like, but if so, let's do it in person.)
After thinking about it, I decided it's because each of the people who had given me pause with their comments had only seen one slice of me. I didn't spend significant time with any of them, or the time I did spend was in situations when I was likely to behave the same way each time.
Just saying that, however, I realized there was one person who DID know much more of me than that. But there were extenuating circumstances that make me doubt that person's motivation for saying what they said. (Sorry to be so cryptic. Again with the offer to explain in person.)
Wow, I just read over this post. Apparently I shouldn't try to respond before having any caffeine in the morning.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 07:23 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-09 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 07:27 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-09 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 10:03 am (UTC)But if getting sexed-up by the Niblet isn't enough, I'm prepped n ready to come over and immediately beat all your minor inconveniences to a greasy pulp.
Or, you know... we could make out?
Re:
Date: 2004-02-09 12:56 pm (UTC)You're the bestest! I need to call you soon. Maybe this weekend? Or will you be busy stalking various hot men?
no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 03:21 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-12 02:03 pm (UTC)I thought about you the other day - WLUW was doing a fundraising drive and to entice people they were having a drawing for a lifetime pass to Schuba's. Free shows whenever you want!
I hope you're doing well.